Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sonal Jain Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sonal Jain Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Delhi) Reopening Fails When Original Issue Not Added — ITAT Delhi Deletes Section 68 Addition on Cash Deposits The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Sonal Jain for AY 2016-17, holding that when no addition is made on the issue for which reassessment was initiated, the Assessing Officer cannot make additions on any other issue. The reassessment was reopened under section 147 to examine investment in an immovable property. During assessment, the assessee satisfactorily explained the source of investment and no addition was made on that count. Howev...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930