Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Arjun Nasta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Manoj Arjun Nasta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

NRI Not Aware of Notices: Mumbai ITAT Restores Reassessment & Deletes Penalties u/s 271(1)(b) & 271(1)(c)

Tribunal heard three connected appeals, one relating to the quantum reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 &  two arising from penalties u/s 271(1)(b) & 271(1)(c). AO had made an addition of ₹62,00,000/- treating investment in an immovable property as unexplained. Assessee submitted that he had been an NRI for several decades, permanently employed abroad, earning only foreign in

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031