Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhargav Ram Munagapati Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhargav Ram Munagapati Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) AY 2015-16 Reassessment Quashed—148 Notice Dated 03.04.2022 Held Time-Barred Beyond Six-Year Limit under Section 149(1)(b) The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2015-16 are without jurisdiction, since the notice under section 148 dated 03.04.2022 was issued beyond the prescribed period of six years as per the first proviso to section 149(1)(b). Following the binding ratio of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal and Deepak Steel and Power Ltd., it was concluded that for AY 2015-16, all ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031