This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) not sustained in absence of intention to conceal income: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rohit Chatterji Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rohit Chatterji Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not imposable in absence of wilful intention on the part of the assessee to conceal income since all the errors in original return was rectified vide revised return.
Facts- The assessee is an individual residing in Singapore. During the year under consideration, the residential status of the assessee is resident and ordinarily resident. Accordingly, the assessee filed the return of income in India declaring a total income of Rs. 12,05,86,110/- which included 50% of the rental income from th...





