This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty Time-Barred When AO’s Satisfaction Recorded Before Notice: ITAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Jayapriya Company (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2021-22
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Jayapriya Company (ITAT Chennai)
Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty order issued under section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was barred by limitation as per section 275(1)(c). The assessee’s assessment order was passed on 30.12.2022, with prior approval of the Additional CIT, and contained specific satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer for alleged violation of section 269SS. Applying CBDT Circular No. 10/2016 dated 26.04.2016, the Tribunal observed that the period of limitation for imposing penalty must be reckoned from the date of re...





