Case Law Details
Case Name : Narendra A Sheth Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In reply to the show-cause notice for initiation of penalty, the assessee has replied that he is a Sr. Citizen; his accounts are looked after by Accountant. The accountant of the assessee is not qualified person. The assessee was under bona fide belief that accounts are not required to be issued under section 44AB of the Act. The assessee specifically pleaded in the reply that the Guidance note, ‘Note of Tax Audit under section 44AB’ issued by ICAI that, if the turnover of Future & Option defined as aggregate of favorable and unfavorable transaction exceed Rs. 40,00,000 than the assess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

