Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narendra A Sheth Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In reply to the show-cause notice for initiation of penalty, the assessee has replied that he is a Sr. Citizen; his accounts are looked after by Accountant. The accountant of the assessee is not qualified person. The assessee was under bona fide belief that accounts are not required to be issued under section 44AB of the Act. The assessee specifically pleaded in the reply that the Guidance note, ‘Note of Tax Audit under section 44AB’ issued by ICAI that, if the turnover of Future & Option defined as aggregate of favorable and unfavorable transaction exceed Rs. 40,00,000 than the assess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930