This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No penalty for addition under section 56(2)(x) due to deeming fiction
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dipakkumar Ishwarlal Panchal Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Dipakkumar Ishwarlal Panchal Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Admittedly the concealment/furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, for which act penalty under section 271(1)(c) in the present case has been levied, related to the income added as per the provisions of section 56(2)(x) of the Act. More particularly on account of the fact that actual consideration paid for purchase of a property was less than its stamp duty value. It is not the case of the Revenue that the assessee was actually found to have paid any amount over and above actual purchase price of the asset. Moreover section 56(2)(x) ...
