No penalty for addition under section 56(2)(x) due to deeming fiction

Dipakkumar Ishwarlal Panchal Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Admittedly the concealment/furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, for which act penalty under section 271(1)(c) in the present case has been levied, related to the income added as per the provisions of section 56(2)(x) of the Act. More particularly on account of the fact that actual consideration paid for purchase of a property was less than its stamp duty value. It is not the case of the Revenue that the assessee was actually found to have paid any amount over an

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.