Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hemraj Prabhudas Chandel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hemraj Prabhudas Chandel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee filed return declaring Rs.3,11,410/-. Case was selected for limited scrutiny to verify credit-card payments & demonetisation-period cash deposits. No compliance was made before AO despite eight opportunities, leading to best-judgment assessment u/s 144. AO added Rs.11,73,620 as unexplained cash expenditure towards credit-card payments u/s 69C & Rs.3,12,500 as unexplained cash deposit. Before Addl. CIT(A), assessee again made no appearance; however, the first appellate authority deleted the addition relating to cash deposit but s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930