Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sutlej Educational Charitable Trust Vs CIT (E) (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 676/(Asr)/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/05/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sutlej Educational Charitable Trust Vs CIT (E) (ITAT Amritsar)

The only issue, thus, that survives is that the funds (or income) of the educational institution are (or, is) not to be utilized by the assessee-trust, owning and managing it, for any other (non-educational) object/purpose, which, as afore-noted, there are several (also refer para 2 of the impugned order/cl. 3 of the trust deed). That is as where the funds of an educational institution are used by the person in receipt thereof for any other purpose, even if charitable, it cannot be said that the said educational institution exists solely for (the purpose of) education. The same also contravenes the third proviso to section 10(23C)(vi). We have perused the balance-sheets as at 31.3.2015 to 31.03.2017 (at PB pages 21 – 33), to find no such diversion. The same being in the nature of a continuing condition could be stipulated by the competent authority while granting the approval. Subject to this, we find no valid reason not to grant approval to the assessee trust qua the Sutlej Public Senior Secondary School at Village Hawas, District Ludhiana.

In view of the foregoing, we, vacating the findings by the ld. CIT(E), direct the grant of approval under section 10(23C)(vi) to the assessee trust qua SPSSS, an educational institution existing solely for the purposes of education and not for the purposes of profit. This, of course, would be subject to the capital/funds of the school being not used for any other (non-educational) activity (object) by the assessee-trust, or any other condition deemed fit and proper, viz. as to maintenance and audit of school accounts separately, etc., in accordance with and as contemplated by law, that the competent authority may impose while granting the said approval. We decide accordingly.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

This is an Appeal by the Assessee-Applicant directed against the Order u/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 26.09.2017 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh (‘CIT(E)’, or the ‘competent authority’, for short).

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031