No disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) where payments made were apparently less than Rs. 20,000 each and to each party less than Rs. 50,000 per year, as per t
TG Team
25 Oct 2010
546 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : Vikas Road Carriers Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Court :Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
Citation :Vikas Road Carriers Ltd. Vs. ITO [2010-TIOL-417-ITAT-MUM]
Brief :In the case of Vikas Road Carriers Ltd. v. ITO [2010-TIOL-417-ITAT-MUM] the Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), ruled that, in light of the very typical facts of the case, no dis allowance could be made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), for non-withholding of tax since the pay
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


Comments are closed.