Follow Us:

No disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) where payments made were apparently less than Rs. 20,000 each and to each party less than Rs. 50,000 per year, as per t

TG Team 25 Oct 2010 546 Views 1 comment Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary

Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vikas Road Carriers Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Warning: Undefined array key 3 in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 95

Court :Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal

Citation :Vikas Road Carriers Ltd. Vs. ITO [2010-TIOL-417-ITAT-MUM]

Brief :In the case of Vikas Road Carriers Ltd. v. ITO [2010-TIOL-417-ITAT-MUM] the Mumbai Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), ruled that, in light of the very typical facts of the case, no dis allowance could be made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), for non-withholding of tax since the pay

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Comments are closed.

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728