This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Later-Year Depreciation Cannot Be Decided Until Base Year Cost Is Finalised: ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
When First Year Is Pending, Consequential Years Can’t Be Decided: ITAT Restores Brand Depreciation Dispute
The Bangalore “C” Bench of the ITAT restored the issue of depreciation on Brand & Technology to the file of the CIT(A), holding that consequential depreciation claims for later years cannot be adjudicated when the very first year of claim remains undecided.
The Assessee had acquired Brand & Technology valued at ₹77.82 crore in AY 2013-14 pursuant to acquisition of two overseas companies. The TPO tre...






