Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) When First Year Is Pending, Consequential Years Can’t Be Decided: ITAT Restores Brand Depreciation Dispute The Bangalore “C” Bench of the ITAT restored the issue of depreciation on Brand & Technology to the file of the CIT(A), holding that consequential depreciation claims for later years cannot be adjudicated when the very first year of claim remains undecided. The Assessee had acquired Brand & Technology valued at ₹77.82 crore in AY 2013-14 pursuant to acquisition of two overseas companies. The TPO tre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930