Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Antony Sunny Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 8079 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/03/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Antony Sunny Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)

In a recent judgment, the Kerala High Court weighed in on the case of Antony Sunny versus the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT). The dispute revolved around an appeal filed by the petitioner against an assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the assessment year 2016-17. The petitioner contested the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Thrissur, which dismissed the appeal due to its delayed filing.

Background: The petitioner, Antony Sunny, contested an assessment order dated 28.12.2018, which had added Rs. 60,00,000/- to his income from business. Despite the petitioner’s initial income declaration of Rs. 20,99,452/-, the assessment determined the gross income to be Rs. 80,99,452/-. Displeased with this decision, Antony Sunny filed an appeal on 21.05.2019, albeit 115 days after the stipulated deadline. The reason cited for the delay was a purported “website problem.”

Court’s Observations: The crux of the court’s evaluation rested on two pivotal aspects: the justification for the delayed filing and the observance of principles of natural justice. The petitioner attributed the late filing to technical issues with the tax department’s website. However, the court found this explanation lacking in credibility, particularly due to the absence of supporting evidence. Moreover, despite several notices issued to the petitioner between 28.12.2018 and 27.01.2019, the petitioner remained unresponsive, further undermining the claim of a website problem.

Judicial Decision: After careful consideration, the court ruled that there was no infringement of natural justice principles in the Commissioner’s decision. Additionally, it found no glaring infirmities or illegalities in the appellate order that warranted its intervention. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Commissioner’s decision to dismiss the appeal on grounds of delay.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031