Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indrajeet Suresh Magar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Indrajeet Suresh Magar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee, an NRI residing in Australia, sold property on 12.04.2018 but was assessed for A.Y. 2018-19 on a sale value of ₹74 lakh u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, treating it as unexplained sale of immovable property. CIT(A)/ NFAC dismissed the appeal ex parte for non-prosecution, citing repeated non-compliance &  applying B.N. Bhattacharjee (118 ITR 461, SC). Before ITAT, the Assessee explained that non-appearance was not deliberate, as he was abroad &  could not access records during the pandemic. On merits, he argued that the sale took place in Apri...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930