Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Karam Veer Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Karam Veer Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In Karam Veer vs ITO, the ITAT Delhi remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer after observing that the assessee’s contentions and additional evidence had not been properly examined by the lower authorities. The reassessment was initiated due to cash deposits of ₹19.88 lakh and other unexplained credits in the assessee’s bank account, coupled with the failure to file returns under section 139. The Assessing Officer treated these amounts as undisclosed income and disallowed deductions claimed under Chapter VI-A. Although the assessee later fi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 143(2) Assessment Quashed for Notice Issued by Officer Without Jurisdiction: ITAT Delhi Section 148 Reassessment Quashed as ₹50 Lakh Threshold Not Met for Same Transaction: ITAT Delhi Can Section 148A Reassessment Be Based Solely on Red-Flagged Information? No Capital Gains Without Transfer Under Development Agreement: ITAT Pune Section 148 Reassessment Quashed for Skipping Approved Section 148A(a) Inquiry: Chhattisgarh HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031