Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Raman Mayavan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Raman Mayavan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

Confirmations Filed but Not Considered—ITAT Chennai Remands ₹2.19 Cr 68 Addition- Assessment Concluded Before Assessee Could Furnish Proof— Rule 46A Evidence Ignored by CIT(A)—Fresh Opportunity Ordered

Chennai Tribunal considered additions u/s 68 aggregating to ₹3,02,65,000 relating to unsecured loan of ₹83,00,000 & advances/creditors of ₹2,19,65,000. Assessee had sought two days’ time during assessment to furnish remaining confirmations, but AO conclud

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Unsecured Loan Addition Unsustainable Without Contrary Evidence Debatable MAT Computation Cannot Be Rectified Under Section 154 Section 263 Revision Quashed for Absence of Exempt Income Ex-Parte Appeal Dismissal Set Aside for Lack of Reasoned Order Reassessment Quashed as JAO Lacked Jurisdiction After Faceless Scheme View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031