Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai Confirms Deletion of ₹2.99 Crore Addition Adopted From Section 143(1) Intimation

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 13316
Case Name
DCIT Vs Leela Lace Holdings Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

DCIT Vs Leela Lace Holdings Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)

Summary: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, considered a Revenue appeal in ITA No. 3722/Mum/2026 along with two connected appeals filed by Leela Lace Holdings Private Limited for Assessment Year 2017-18. The Revenue challenged the order of the CIT(A), NFAC, which had deleted an addition of Rs. 2,99,65,837/- under the head “Income from Business or Profession”. The assessee had filed its return on 29.11.2017 declaring total income of Rs. 3,92,00,550/-. The return was processed by CPC, Bengaluru, under Section 143(1), pursuant to an intimation dated 16.03.2019 determining total taxable income at Rs. 6,91,66,390/-.

However, scrutiny proceedings had already commenced when notice under Section 143(2) was issued on 09.08.2018. The assessment was subsequently completed under Section 143(3) on 11.12.2019 at the same total income of Rs. 6,91,66,390/-. Before the CIT(A), the assessee pointed out that its return disclosed NIL income under “Business and Profession”, whereas the assessment order contained Rs. 2,99,65,837/- under that head without discussion or reasoning and had merely adopted the figure appearing in the Section 143(1) intimation. The CIT(A), after examining the ITR-6 acknowledgment, computation and assessment order, held that the addition was without merit and directed recomputation in accordance with the returned income, subject to other valid adjustments. Before the Tribunal, the Revenue contended that the assessee had not appealed against the Section 143(1) intimation and therefore could not challenge the adjustment during the Section 143(3) proceedings. The assessee submitted that the Section 143(1) intimation was issued after scrutiny proceedings had commenced, that rectification applications under Section 154 had also been filed and rejected, and that once the scrutiny assessment was completed, the earlier intimation merged with the Section 143(3) assessment. Reliance was placed on decisions including Geecee Ventures Ltd., Innovsources Services Pvt. Ltd., Gujrat Poly-Avx Electronics Ltd. and National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 23,564

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.