Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinod Kumar Goyal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vinod Kumar Goyal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi)

Section 69C Can’t Be Used for Recorded Purchases: No 145(3), No Disallowance—ITAT Delhi Deletes 12.5% Estimation

Assessee, engaged in trading of iron & steel, faced addition of ₹1.03 crore by estimating profit @12.5% of purchases, invoking s.69C on the allegation of bogus purchases, merely because notices u/s 133(6) issued to suppliers were not complied with. AO accepted sales, did not

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats Between Third Parties Not Evidence Against Company Without Corroboration Overtime Wages Must Include Allowances Under Factories Act: SC Commission Addition Deleted for Lack of Proof of Accommodation Entries: ITAT Delhi Double Taxation Bar Invoked to Delete Interest TP Adjustment: ITAT Delhi Once Section 263 Order Is Quashed, Fresh Assessment Cannot Survive: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031