Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Padam Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Padam Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)

Assessee, an individual, filed his return for A.Y. 2018-19 declaring total income of ₹ 18.32 lakh & showing agricultural income of ₹ 8.37 lakh. A search u/s 132 was carried out on 01-11-2018, after which notice u/s 153A was issued. Assessee reiterated the same income in his response.

During assessment, AO observed that Assessee had only furnished copies of patta showing land ownership but produced no supporting evidence-such as chitta, adangal, expenditure details, or sale bills-to prove cultivation or sale of agricultural produce.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Under Section 147/144 Struck Down for Not Issuing Section 143(2) Despite Valid Return Survey-Based 8% Estimation Cut to 4%: ITAT Ensures Parity With Parents’ Cases Temple Vazhipadu vs Demonetisation: ITAT Deletes SBN Addition of Rs. 1.45 Lakh Vivad se Vishwas Opt-Out Does Not Bar Tax Appeal: ITAT Decision Section 96 Overrides Income Tax for Post-2014 Land Acquisitions View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031