Case Law Details
MRS Jewellery Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Introduction: In a significant ruling, ITAT Chennai partly upheld the Assessing Officer’s (AO) order in the case of MRS Jewellery Vs DCIT. The AO’s assessment centered on excess stock found during a survey, leading to an increased tax liability for the assessee. The case stands as an important precedent in the interpretation of stock valuation and taxation for businesses dealing in gold and silver jewellery.
Analysis: During the survey operation, an excess stock of gold and silver was found, which was brought to tax by the AO. MRS Jewellery argued that they had purchased the excess stock as old gold and silver through bought notes, which they claimed had more impurities, justifying their lower purchase price. However, the AO rejected this argument and taxed the full value of the excess stock.
In the first appeal, CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal of MRS Jewellery. Acknowledging the nature of the business, he granted an ad-hoc relief estimating that 25% of the excess stock might represent old gold/silver articles purchased from customers.
Upon further appeal, ITAT Chennai modified the relief from 25% to 50%, providing a further reduction in the tax liability of MRS Jewellery. The decision recognizes the potential for impurities in old gold and silver, contributing to the discourse on the accurate valuation of such assets for taxation purposes.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
