Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Manipal Hospitals (Bangalore) Private Limited (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Manipal Hospitals (Bangalore) Private Limited (ITAT Bangalore) 2ITAT Bangalore Confirms Deletion of Penalty for Mere Disallowance of Claim: Procedural Lapse in Notice Proves Fatal to Revenue Assessee claimed ₹2.15 crores as interest expenditure, treated by AO as pre-operative capital expenditure, and disallowed. Penalty was levied under Section 271(1)(c) on the ground of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. CIT(A) deleted the penalty citing procedural defects and lack of intent to conceal income. Tribunal noted that the procedural Defect in Notice as the AO failed to record ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930