Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arvind Chhotalal Morzaria Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arvind Chhotalal Morzaria Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Interest follows purpose, not label: ITAT allows deduction u/s 57(iii) for interest paid on housing loan used to earn interest income Mumbai ITAT  allowed assessee’s appeal &  deleted disallowance of ₹30.90 lakh made by AO by denying deduction of interest u/s 57(iii). Assessee had acquired a property from own funds &  subsequently raised a mortgage loan from Bank of Baroda, which was directly disbursed to a company, yielding taxable interest income. AO & CIT(A) treated the borrowing as a housing loan &  restricted deductio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930