Case Law Details
Case Name : Monica Parmanand Mirchandani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Monica Parmanand Mirchandani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that hardship compensation is not a revenue receipt but constitute a capital receipt. Accordingly, AO directed to delete addition made towards the same.
Facts- The assessee is an individual and is a tuition teacher by profession. AO had passed the assessment order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 30.11.2019, determining total income at Rs.74,12,272/-, after making an addition of Rs.71,34,472/- on the amount received from DB MIG Realtors & Builders Pvt. Ltd. as ‘revenue receipt’. F
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.