Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Monica Parmanand Mirchandani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Monica Parmanand Mirchandani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that hardship compensation is not a revenue receipt but constitute a capital receipt. Accordingly, AO directed to delete addition made towards the same. Facts- The assessee is an individual and is a tuition teacher by profession. AO had passed the assessment order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 30.11.2019, determining total income at Rs.74,12,272/-, after making an addition of Rs.71,34,472/- on the amount received from DB MIG Realtors & Builders Pvt. Ltd. as ‘revenue receipt’. First appellate authority upheld the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031