Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Monica Parmanand Mirchandani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Monica Parmanand Mirchandani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that hardship compensation is not a revenue receipt but constitute a capital receipt. Accordingly, AO directed to delete addition made towards the same.

Facts- The assessee is an individual and is a tuition teacher by profession. AO had passed the assessment order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act on 30.11.2019, determining total income at Rs.74,12,272/-, after making an addition of Rs.71,34,472/- on the amount received from DB MIG Realtors & Builders Pvt. Ltd. as ‘revenue receipt’. F

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930