Full Unconditional Stay of Demand Granted Where Addition on Third Party Statement was Without Cross Examination

Dilipkumar P. Chheda Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)

In so far the present case is concerned, here also the additions have been made primarily on the basis of the statement made by Shri. Nilesh Bharani and also on the basis of certain entries in the telephone diary. However, we find from the materials on record that though summons was issued to Shri. Nilesh Bharani for cross-examination by the petitioner, Shri. Nilesh Bharani did not appear on the date fixed and therefore he could not be cross-examined. Thus, we are prima-facie of the view that reli

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.