This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Full Unconditional Stay of Demand Granted Where Addition on Third Party Statement was Without Cross Examination
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dilipkumar P. Chheda Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Dilipkumar P. Chheda Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
In so far the present case is concerned, here also the additions have been made primarily on the basis of the statement made by Shri. Nilesh Bharani and also on the basis of certain entries in the telephone diary. However, we find from the materials on record that though summons was issued to Shri. Nilesh Bharani for cross-examination by the petitioner, Shri. Nilesh Bharani did not appear on the date fixed and therefore he could not be cross-examined. Thus, we are prima-facie of the view that reliance placed on such uncorroborate...





