Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Pearl Precision Products Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Pearl Precision Products Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) No Physical Stock Taking, Excel Sheet Alone Insufficient: Stock Difference Addition u/s 69A Deleted The Delhi Bench of the ITAT, in DCIT v. Pearl Precision Products Pvt. Ltd. (AY 2020-21), upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting an addition of ₹1,82,87,179 made under section 69A on account of alleged excess stock found during survey proceedings. The Tribunal noted that, despite the Assessing Officer’s claim, no actual physical stock verification was carried out during the survey under section 133A. Instead, the survey team relied solel...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930