Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) deleted in absence of adequate intimation

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ketan Brothers Diamondz Exports Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017–18
Advertisement Ketan Brothers Diamondz Exports Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Disallowance on delay in payment toward employee’s contribution to PF u/s 36(1)(va) via u/s 143(1) deleted in absence of adequate intimation to the assessee. Facts- The first issue arising in present appeal is pertaining to disallowance of Rs.32,140, on account of alleged delay in payment towards employee’s contribution to Provident Fund (P.F.) under section 36(1)(va) r/w section 2(24) of the Act, by the Centralized Processing Centre, Bengaluru, while processing the income tax return under section 143(1) of the Act, whi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *