This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) deleted in absence of adequate intimation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ketan Brothers Diamondz Exports Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017–18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ketan Brothers Diamondz Exports Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Disallowance on delay in payment toward employee’s contribution to PF u/s 36(1)(va) via u/s 143(1) deleted in absence of adequate intimation to the assessee.
Facts-
The first issue arising in present appeal is pertaining to disallowance of Rs.32,140, on account of alleged delay in payment towards employee’s contribution to Provident Fund (P.F.) under section 36(1)(va) r/w section 2(24) of the Act, by the Centralized Processing Centre, Bengaluru, while processing the income tax return under section 143(1) of the Act, whi...






