This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Denial of Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54F for Property Described as “Makaan” Justified Due to Brick-Kiln Construction
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Himanshu Garg VS ACIT (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Himanshu Garg VS ACIT (Delhi High Court)
Denial of capital gain exemption u/s 54F for property described in registered sale deed as “Makaan” was justified as having Brick-Kiln construction
Conclusion: Tribunal was justified in declining capital gain exemption under Section 54F with respect to a property described as “makaan” (house) in the registered sale deed but in reality having a brick kiln construction.
Held: Assessee had sold certain lands and sought capital gain exemption under Section 54F against investment made in a new property (makaan), jointly with two ot...





