Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrakant Shamappa Kontha Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandrakant Shamappa Kontha Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Pre-Checkmate Era Cannot Be Rewritten: ITAT Deletes 36(1)(va) Additions Made by CPC- Finance Act 2021 Prospective Only: ITAT Protects Assessee from Retrospective PF Hit- When CPC Overrides HC Law, ITAT Steps In: Employee Contribution Disallowance Quashed Assessee filed returns for AYs 2019-20 & 2020-21. CPC processed the returns u/s 143(1) & made additions towards employees’ PF & ESIC contributions u/s 36(1)(va) as they were deposited beyond the due dates under respective labour laws. Disallowance of ₹10.04 crore & ₹12....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930