Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Thiyagarajan Raja (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Thiyagarajan Raja (ITAT Chennai) Chennai ITAT Upholds 2% Commission Estimation: Entire Cash Deposits of E-Seva Operator Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A The Chennai ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)’s decision to tax only the profit element embedded in the transactions, holding that the entire cash deposits of ₹1.40 crore could not be treated as unexplained money under Section 69A when the assessee had established that he was carrying on a genuine E-Seva facilitation business. The assessee operated an E-Seva centre, providing services such as Aadhaar corre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Entire Books Cannot Be Rejected for One Unproved Expense: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 10(10B) Exemption Allowed on BSNL VRS Compensation: ITAT Ahmedabad On-Money Addition Restricted to Co-owner’s Investment Share: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031