Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandip Kailasappa Lakade Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandip Kailasappa Lakade Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Upheld Where Escapement Exceeded ₹50 Lakh — Cash Deposits Taxed u/s 69A The Pune ITAT (B Bench) dismissed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2016-17 and upheld the validity of reassessment under sections 147/148, holding that the case fell within the extended limitation period since the escaped income exceeded ₹50 lakh. The assessment was reopened based on information of cash deposits aggregating to ₹1.55 crore in the assessee’s bank account with a multi-state co-operative credit society. Despite issuance of notices ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930