Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jitendra Rajkumar Agarwal Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jitendra Rajkumar Agarwal Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Ahmedabad) Entire Bogus Purchases Can’t Be Taxed — Only 2% Profit Element Sustained- No Transport Proof, Yet Sales Exist: Tribunal Applies GP Theory; Rejects 115BBE Assessee, a chemical trader, was subjected to reassessment u/s 147 based on Insight information alleging bogus purchases of ₹1,75,16,480 from M/s S.K. Enterprises. AO held that the Assessee failed to produce weighbridge slips, delivery challans, PAN & complete address of transporters, DVU notices returned unserved, several vehicle numbers were non-transport vehicles, &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930