Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Bangalore ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Bank Interest, Distinguishes Totgars

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 9851
Case Name
Nagapura Credit Co Operative Society Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2023-24
Advertisement

Nagapura Credit Co Operative Society Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Bangalore ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Bank Deposits; Distinguishes Totgars Decision and Treats Income as Business Income

The Bangalore ITAT allowed the appeal of Nagapura Credit Co-operative Society, holding that interest income of ₹1.56 crore earned from deposits with co-operative banks, commercial banks and other financial institutions is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Assessing Officer had treated the interest as “Income from Other Sources” and denied deduction under Section 80P, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Totgars Co-operative Sale Society. The Tribunal also condoned a 91-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting that the delay was caused by the serious illness of the society’s Chief Executive Officer.

The Tribunal observed that the assessee was a credit co-operative society exclusively engaged in providing credit facilities to its members and that the deposits represented business funds temporarily parked until deployment in lending operations. Relying on the Karnataka High Court decisions in Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Co-operative Ltd. and Principal CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society (392 ITR 74), it held that interest earned on such deposits is attributable to the business of providing credit facilities and therefore constitutes business income, qualifying for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

The Tribunal further clarified that the Revenue had misapplied the Karnataka High Court decision reported in 395 ITR 611, as that case dealt with a claim under Section 80P(2)(d), whereas the present case involved a claim under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). Holding that the assessee’s claim was fully covered by the binding precedents of the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reversed the orders of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), and consequently found it unnecessary to adjudicate the alternative grounds relating to Section 80P(2)(d) and Section 57. The appeal was allowed.

Cases Discussed

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,458

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.