Case Law Details

Case Name : Joseph George and Co. Vs. ITO (2010) 328 ITR 161 (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (4417) Kerala High Court (207)

Joseph George and Co. Vs. ITO (2010) 328 ITR 161 (Kerala High Court)-  On the above issue, it was decided that while lodging is a business, however, letting out of building to the bank on long-term lease could not be treated as business. Therefore, the rental income from bank has to be assessed as income from house property.

Only two issues arise from the three questions raised in the connected appeals filed by the assessee. The first issue is whether the income received from building under the name “Konny Building” is business income or not. Counsel contended that the assessee is engaged in letting out rooms in the lodging house and the Konny Building is one rented out to the bank on long-term lease. It is conceded that the income from the lodging building is treated as business income and the appellant has no grievance against the same. However, we are unable to accept the appellant’s contention that rental income from the Konny Building also should be treated as business income because letting out building on long-term lease is not a business activity at all. While lodging is business, letting out building to the bank cannot be treated as business. It is to be assessed as income from property. We, therefore, uphold the finding of the Tribunal with regard to the confirmation of assessment on the income from the Konny Building.


More Under Income Tax

Posted Under

Category : Income Tax (28342)
Type : Judiciary (12648)
Tags : high court judgments (4733)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Posts