This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Appeal must be filed before ITAT Bench having jurisdiction over AO
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramamoorthy Srinivasan Chandilya Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ramamoorthy Srinivasan Chandilya Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Assessee filed an appeal before ITAT Chennai Bench against the order of CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi. At the time of hearing, it was noticed that the jurisdictional Assessing Officer of Assessee is located in Hyderabad.
As per Rule 4 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 read with CBDT Notification No. F.No.63-AD(AT/97) dated 16.09.1997, the jurisdiction of ITAT Bench is determined by the location of AO. Therefore, since AO is in Hyderabad, the appeal should have been filed before ITAT Hyderabad Bench, not Chennai Bench.
Bench also reli...
Author Info
