Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hemant Manaharlal Shah (HUF) Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 19405 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/03/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Hemant Manaharlal Shah (HUF) Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court)

 The Assessing Officer formed a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, on the ground that noticing a big mismatch between the returned income and cash transactions in the assessee’s bank accounts, queries were raised, which remained un­replied. This is contrary to the facts on record. As noted, in reply to the notice dated 21.02.2017 issued by the Assessing Officer, the assessee had given a detailed reply on 06.03.2017. He had pointed out that he had received Rs.25 lakhs in cash for sale of his Mango crop. Such amount was deposited in the bank account. Part of it was withdrawn and redeposited. That is how the total cash deposit in his account reached Rs.30.75 lakhs during the relevant period. Along with his reply, the assessee had also furnished a copy of the agreement between the assessee and the purchaser of the Mango crop. The bank statement was also produced. If the Assessing Officer was not still satisfied, it was always open for him to call for further details or even for valid reason to discard the assessee’s reply and reopen the assessment recording the reasons. However, under no circumstances, he could have simply ignored the reply and proceeded to form a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment on the premise that his queries had remained un­replied. In plain terms, his reasons proceeded on wrong facts.  His satisfaction was thus, tainted by wrong facts. His attempt to cover the issue through the order disposing of objections must fail. His assertion that such large amount of agricultural income required verification, would amount to improving the reasons and also seeking to carry out fishing inquiry through the process of reopening of the assessment.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner has challenged a notice dated 28.03.2017 issued by the respondent-­Assessing Officer

seeking to reopen the petitioner’s assessment for the assessment year 2010-11.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031