Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Kavitha Siddareddy (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.160/Chny/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/06/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs Kavitha Siddareddy (ITAT Chennai)

ITAT Chennai held that addition towards unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as source for purchase of property duly established with necessary evidences.

Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, it was noticed that the assessee has purchased property for a consideration of Rs.3.40 Crs., and thus, the AO called upon the assessee to explain source for purchase of property. In response, the assessee submitted that she had received unsecured loan of Rs.1.40 Crs. from her husband, Mr.S.V.Ranga Reddy. She further stated that she had drawn a sum of Rs.1.90 Crs. from the partnership firm i.e. M/s.SVR Construction Co., where she was one of the partners, and she had also drawn Rs.60 lakhs from M/s.Vinayak Infra Projects.

Rejecting the arguments of the assessee and made additions towards source for purchase of property as unexplained investment u/s.69 of the Act.

CIT(A) deleted the said additions. Being aggrieved, revenue has preferred the present appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031