Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Om Parkash Nahar Vs. ITO ( ITAT-Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Om Parkash Nahar Vs. ITO ( ITAT-Delhi) The amount deposited during demonetization period was relate to out of withdrawals from the same account from 2014,2015 & 2016 is not treated as income from undisclosed source The assessee’s explanation is that looking to his old age and suffering from various ailments as he had suffered a heart attack and had juvenile diabetes, therefore, for his mental security he was in the habit of keeping huge cash with him. This is also evident from the fact as brought out on record by the ld. Counsel that since beginning, assessee has been withdrawing cash an...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA. Ajit Sharma (Mob.No. 9871097656) is an Chartered Accountant since January 2010, has taken bachelor degree of commerce in 2001. He is a fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountant of India (ICAI). In 2017 he is also qualified the course of Certified Concurrent Auditor of Bank conducte View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mumbai ITAT Allows Gratuity, Performance Incentives & Foreign Tax Credit TDS on CAM Charges: Section 194C Not 194I – Delhi HC HC Disallows Deduction of Additional Sugarcane Price in Section 32AB Calculations Cash Deposits during Demonetization from Business Sales Are Not Unexplained No PAN, No Problem: ITAT Delhi Accepts Low-Wage Worker Salary Payments in Cash View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930