Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Refex Industries Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Refex Industries Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Madras High Court)

According to the petitioners, Section 50 that provides for levy of interest on belated payments would apply only to payments of tax by cash, belatedly, and would not stand triggered in the case of available ITC, since such ITC represents credit due to an assessee by the Department held as such.

The specific question for resolution before me is as to whether in a case such as the present, where

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

7 Comments

  1. deven shah says:

    Respected Sir,

    I had filed the GSTR-3B Return of March 2019, in time i.e. before 20.04.2019, but somehow fails to show correct figures of Output Tax liability, in GSTR-3B. Then, I noticed that, and shown those short paid output tax in August 2019 GSTR-3b returns. Department is asking to pay interest on that short payment. Is it payable ?. Though I had sufficient / more ITC available than this short paid tax. So, can i get the benefit of Sec 50(1) of interest levied on net cash liability ?. Please advice. Thank You.

  2. v venkateswara rao says:

    As per the Act there is no facility to provide interest on the input credit then how the interest on such portion will be neglected , if it is correct, it will be legal incentive to the late filers.

  3. v venkateswara rao says:

    As per the Act the there is no facility to provide interest on the input credit then how the interest on such portion will be neglected , if it is correct, it will be legal incentive to the late filers.

  4. v venkateswara rao says:

    As per the Act the there is no facility to provide interest on the input credit then how the interest on such portion will be neglected , it is correct it will be legal incentive to the late filers.

  5. prachi vaidya says:

    sir very useful article in my case after filing all pending returns and after filing revocation application the assistant commissioner without specifying reason cancelled revocation application when we went for personal he only saying pay interest on net tax liability now please advise what steps to be TAKEN

  6. ADV. RUPESH MUNOT says:

    A judgement waited from long time… Justice still prevails.. It has to be well communicated as early as possible to the CBIC for quick implementation by the authorities. Main portion of the judgement is interest to be calculated on the net tax liability, retrospective effect from 01/07/2017.

  7. Paras Jain says:

    section 100 of Finance act 2019 inserting proviso to section 50(1) has not been notified yet. So relying upon unnotified provison is material error which would go to the roots of decision of this case.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930