Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Monalisa Co-Operative Housing Society Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-30/2020-21/B-71
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Monalisa Co-Operative Housing Society Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)

Whether the receipt of a gratuitous payment from an outgoing member for the time he has resided in the society be taxable under the CGST Act, 2017 as there is no corresponding service being provided separately by the tax payer society?

When there is a transfer of a flat, the outgoing member makes a gratuitous payment in gratitude of payment. The same does not have any implications on outgoing formalities to be completed as per the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The Applicant states that the above contribution made is entirely voluntary and is not at all a consideration received in lieu of services provided by the Applicant. The outgoing member makes such contribution on his own volition.

From the said submissions made by the applicant, it appears that each and every outgoing member makes a gratuitous payment to the applicant in gratitude thus leading to a conclusion that all sellers/Transferor of flat in the society, without a single exception are in gratitude towards the Applicant Society. Thus, it appears that the applicant society has laid down norms albeit orally it seems, that there is a compulsion for an outgoing member to show gratitude to the Applicant Society by way of making gratuitous/voluntary payments to the Society. We have already mentioned above that such voluntary payments cannot be accepted by the Applicant Society from the Transferors/Transferee as per the Model Bye Laws. We are of the opinion that the amounts are collected for smooth transfer of the flat from the Transferor to the Transferee.

We are reminded by the observation made by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Alankar Sahkari Griha Rachana Sanstha Maryadit vs Atul Mahadev and another, mentioned above and agree that, in a situation where a flat purchaser wants a smooth transaction and transfer of the share certificate in his name, the society enjoys a dominant position and under such circumstances, the society may demand payment of amounts from the flat purchaser, under the garb of ‘voluntary donations’.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031