Good seized due to expiry of e-way bill cannot be released on indemnity bond

M/s Livguard Energy Technologies (P) Ltd Vs State of Uttarakhand (Uttarakhand High Court)

Uttarakhand High Court has declined to accede to petitioner’s request for release of vehicle and goods seized on merely furnishing an indemnity bond. It observed that it would be inappropriate to issue a direction contrary to provisions of Section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017 which stipulates that goods can only be released on furnishing a bank guarantee. The goods were seized due to expiry of e-way bill while the goods were still in tra

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.