This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Waste & Scrap Not Manufactured Goods Under Rule 6(3): CESTAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tata Bluescope Steel Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Tata Bluescope Steel Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi)
Waste & Scrap Arising During Manufacture Not ‘Manufactured Goods’ for Rule 6(3): CESTAT Delhi
The appellant challenged three orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) upholding demands under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals involved two issues: (i) demand of 7% of job work charges received for manufacturing goods under Notification No. 214/86-CE, and (ii) demand of 6% of the value of waste and scrap cleared by the appellant.
On the first issue, the appellant contended that the activity treated...





