Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai held that unjust enrichment is not applicable to refund consequent upon finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Facts- Provisional assessment of the respondent was finalized with demand of Rs. 28,09,480/-. During remand proceedings of the same, the adjudicating authority issued show cause notice dt. 07.10.200

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930