This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Refund post finalization of provisional assessment u/r 9B of Central Excise Rules not hit by unjust enrichment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Vs Royal Enfield (Unit of M/s.Eicher Motors Ltd.) (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that unjust enrichment is not applicable to refund consequent upon finalization of provisional assessment under Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Facts- Provisional assessment of the respondent was finalized with demand of Rs. 28,09,480/-. During remand proceedings of the same, the adjudicating authority issued show cause notice dt. 07.10.2008 with corrigendum dt. 20.10.2008 proposing to demand Rs.3,14,69,952/- (Rs.47,18,567/- towards packing charges and Rs.2,67,...
Author Info
