Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gujarat Borosil Limited Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Tax Appeal No. 14081 of 2013- DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/08/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Gujarat Borosil Limited Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that appellant are entitled for the interest from the 3 months of the order of the tribunal till the refund of pre-deposit was granted.

Facts- The issue involved in the present case is that whether, refund of pre-deposit made while filing the appeal before the tribunal is due from 3 months of passing of remand order by the Tribunal or after 3 months of passing order in de novo adjudication and consequential liability of department to pay interest thereon.

Conclusion- We find that in various judgments it has been settled that as regard refund of pre-deposit, there is no requirement for filing a refund claim. The department must give the refund suo moto on the basis of Tribunal’s order therefore merely because the appellant have not filed the proper refund claim within 3 months of the Tribunal order, department cannot be absolved from the liability of interest on the refund of pre-deposit.

Held that appellant are entitled for the interest from the 3 months of the order of the tribunal till the refund was granted.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031