Demand under Rule 14 cannot be made on ISD if he does not avail cenvat credit

Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST, Mumbai Central (CESTAT Mumbai)

In this case  demand was raised from the input service distributor who has distributed the service credit to their respective factory on the ground that the input service viz. air travel agent service, is not admissible as the service related to business activity shall exclude on the definition of input service with effect from 1.4.2011.

I find that Rule 14 applies to the person who avails credit wrongly which is recoverable. In the present case, the appellant has not availed

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.