Sunil Kumar & Company Sri Ganganagar Vs Union Of India (Rajastan High Court) High Court grant liberty to the petitioner to make an application before GST Council through Standing Counsel, who is further requested to hand over the same to the jurisdictional officer for forwarding the same to the GST Council to issue requisite certificate […]
Aditya Gupta Vs. Union of India (Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench) Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the petition and has submitted that allegations levelled against the petitioner were serious in nature. After thorough investigation of the case it transpired that accused had committed fraud to the tune of Rs. 22 Crores by creating […]
Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for Union of India have opposed the bail application. It is contended that petitioner has created 26 firms to facilitate availment and utilization of input Tax Credit to the tune of Rs. 108.36 crores.
Subhash Chandra Tyagi Vs Directorate General Of Goods And Service Tax (Rajasthan High Court) The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Criminal Complaint No. DGGI /320/ Gr.I/ INV/ GST/ SCT/ 15/2019 registered at Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court), District Jaipur for the […]
Rajasthan Tax Consultants Association has filed a writ with Hon;ble Rajasthan High Court to direct the CBDT to decide the representation of the RTCA requesting extension due date of filing of Tax Audit Report and Income-tax Return for the assessment year 2020-2021 till December 31, 2020. Relevant Text of the Petition is as follows:- The […]
Online fantasy sports games offered on the Dream 11 platforms were not considered as gambling/betting as the format of online fantasy game offered by Dream 11 was a game of mere skill and their business had protection under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
Sandeep Goyal Vs Union Of India (Rajsthan High Court) Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the petitions and has submitted that allegations levelled against the petitioners were serious in nature. After thorough investigation of the case it transpired that accused had created 75 fake firms and had issued GST invoices of taxable value of Rs. […]
Submissions were made that the Tax Board came to the conclusion that the department could not exercise powers under Section 26 of the RVAT Act, 2003 as the said power was not available under the RIPS, 2003 and also came to the conclusion on merits of the dispute that the amount of ‘partial exemption received by the assessee’ was not part of ‘payable tax’ and, therefore, basis for raising the demand was also quashed. It was vehemently submitted that the findings on both the issues are incorrect and deserve to be set aside.
In the instant case, the petitioner is requesting for bail against the offenses under Sections 132(1), (b), and (c) of Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
In order to enable the petitioners to avail Tansitional Credit in Electronic Credit Ledger. It was also prayed that the respondents should give effect to Form GST Tran-1 that had been manually submitted to the respondent-department to avail relevant Legitimate Input Tax Credit.
