NCLT Ahmedabad held that before commencement of insolvency, the assets of the corporate debtor are stripped many a times by the management. The suspended management conceals the data from RP during CIRP process. Amount directed to be deposited with Corporate Debtor as the transaction is hit by provisions of section 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Legal process of restoring struck-off companies by NCLT. Learn about appeals, defenses, and the cost implications in the restoration of company names.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that the resolution plan submitted by the Resolution Professional of Superdrawn Industries Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) stands approved at it has been approved with 100% voting share and plan meets the requirement of being viable and feasible.
NCLT Kolkata held that application filed by resolution professional of BKM Industries Limited (Corporate Debtor) for approval of resolution plan stand approved.
NLCT Chandigarh held that Resolution Plan in respect of corporate debtor BBN Foods Hi-Tech Processing Private Limited being in accordance with Sections 30 and 31 of the Code and complies with Regulations 38 and 39 of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 is approved.
NCLT Delhi held that resolution plan submitted by the Successful Resolution Applicant which was approved by CoC cannot be interfered by Adjudicating Authority. Adjudicating Authority is not empowered to analyse or evaluate commercial decision of CoC.
NCLT approves resolution plan filed by Pradeep Kumar Kabra RP for Cengres Tiles Ltd, ensuring its effective implementation. Get detailed insights into judgment.
NCLT Ahmedabad approved the resolution plan submitted by M/s. GCCL Infrastructure and Projects Limited (Corporate Debtor) as resolution plan has provisions of its effective implementation.
Explore scope of judicial review in IBC as defined by Supreme Court. Learn how Adjudicating Authority’s role is limited to specific parameters, avoiding interference with commercial decisions.
NCLT Mumbai held that PF/Gratuity dues are third-party assets belonging to workers and should be prioritized in liquidation. The EPFO claims will not fall under the waterfall mechanism of the IBC.
