ITAT Mumbai held that cancellation of registration of trust retrospectively from AY 2016-17 under section 12AB(4) of the Income Tax Act is invalid.
Learn about ITAT Mumbai’s decision on TDS benefit allowance for Ignitive Digitech Private Ltd Vs DCIT – aligning TDS benefits with income assessment year.
“ITAT Mumbai upholds tax exemption for share of profit from partnership firm, rejects addition u/s 68 due to non-payment of taxes by the firm. Read the full ruling.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of a production supervisor, declaring no illegality in adopting presumptive tax under section 44AD. Full analysis of the case.
ITAT Mumbai allows the appeal by Jerry John Mendonca against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for AY 2011-12. The ITAT imposes a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the assessee for non-compliance, to be paid to the PM Relief Fund.
ITAT Mumbai rules that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is not leviable on estimated additions. The decision is based on the principle established in previous judgments.
ITAT Mumbai held that Corporate Guarantee facility provided to overseas AE by the assessee is an international transaction and hence addition towards Arm’s Length Guarantee Fee confirmed.
ITAT Mumbai allows the claim of deduction u/s. 80JJAA for the assessment year 2020-21, as the taxpayer had filed the original return of income on time. The claim was initially denied due to an error in categorizing the revised return as an original return.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Mumbai’s decision on DCIT Vs ICICI Bank Ltd., addressing disallowance of exempt income, inordinate delay, and the crucial role of interest-free funds.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessing officer passed final assessment order u/s 144C(13) r.w.s 143(3) without passing a draft assessment order u/s 144C(1), said order being violative of provisions of Sec. 144C(1) deserved to be set aside.
