Issuance Of Letters Of Comfort/Support will Construe As International Transaction U/s 92B considering corporate guarantee issued by assessee could not be compared with the letters of comfort and therefore agreed with the computation of arm’s length rate of 0.04%.
ITAT noted that company’s primary objective was providing IT services, not letting out properties. Therefore, it upheld Assessing Officer’s decision to treat rental income as income from house property and disallow depreciation claimed by company.
Expenditure incurred by assessee should be disallowed to the extent that expenditure which had been incurred for evaluation of business opportunities that could not be said to be in line with the existing business or an extension of the existing business of assessee of manufacturing of paints and enamels.
ITAT referred to principle that expenses are allowable in year of crystallization of their liability, even if they relate to an earlier period. It held that expenses crystallized in current assessment year are deductible, regardless of when they were incurred.
Read the full text of ITAT Mumbai’s order in the case of LANXESS India Pvt Ltd vs DCIT, upholding TNMM method over CUP for benchmarking export transactions under manufacturing segment.
In the case of Gopalkrishna Pandu Shetty Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai), deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act is allowed for a property purchased in the wife’s name. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Discover the ITAT Mumbai’s order directing re-adjudication regarding the liability of property tax paid by Rare Townships Pvt Ltd on behalf of the Collector.
ITAT Mumbai rules penalty under Section 270A deleted as I-T authority failed to consider reasons for difference in sale consideration and stamp duty valuation.
In DCIT Vs Nilesh Shantilal Tank case, Mumbai ITAT confirms 12.5% gross profit margin on alleged bogus purchases as sales remain undisputed. Full text of the order included.
Mumbai ITAT’s ruling in Vijay Suresh Dave Vs DCIT regarding addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68. Detailed analysis of the case and conclusions.
