Explore the Madras High Court’s judgment/order in K.G.Denim Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, addressing an inadvertent error in 87 shipping bills. Learn about the court’s direction to inspect documents and the timeline set for resolution.
Discover if the pendency of an income tax adjudication proceeding is a bar to prosecution in the Madras High Court case of R. Revathy vs ACIT. Learn the legal principles & implications of the judgment & their effect on the petitioner’s case for an assessed income of Rs. 24,09,170/- for the assessment year 2012-13.
Madras High Court addresses GST registration cancellation, emphasizing language accessibility in notices and suggesting SMS and regional language notifications. Details of the judgment included.
Madras High Court held that initiation of prosecution for the offence punishable u/s. 276CC of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained as proviso to section 276CC grants relief to assessee when tax payable determined by regular assessment, as reduced by advance tax paid and TDS, does not exceed Rs.3,000/-.
Madras High Court held that as GST registration sought from retrospective date, the input tax credit ought to have provided. Accordingly, impugned order directing to forego Input Tax Credit is unreasonable and cannot be sustained.
Madras High Court held that the CBDT is not empowered to fix the time limit for filing the application for compounding of offences, which is contrary to the provisions of Section 279(2) of the IT Act. Accordingly, CBDT circular dated 14.06.2019 fixing the same is liable to be struck down.
In a Madras High Court ruling, recovery proceedings against Shewil Trading Company are halted until the Cyber Crime Cell completes its investigation. Know the case, implications, and the direction given by the court.
Explore Lenovo vs Joint Commissioner GST case on Section 54(1) time limits for GST refund. Detailed analysis of rejection and mismatch issues.
Madras High Court held that provision of fixing time limit under Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS Scheme) is directory in nature and not mandatory. Accordingly, time limit for making payment of tax under SVLDRS Scheme is directory in nature.
Madras High Court held that prosecution under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act justified due to non-filing of return within the stipulated time and wilfully concealing its true and correct income.
