In an ex-parte order due to non-attendance, ITAT remits the case of Ravi Prakash Sharma vs. ITO back to the Assessing Officer. Get the full text of the order here.
ITAT Jaipur held that the provision of section 194C of the Income Tax Act is applicable to work and not for purchase made which are liable for VAT. Hence, TDS u/s. 194C is not leviable as payments were made for purchase of material and not for any work contract.
ITAT Jaipur held that interest paid on TDS is compensatory in nature and is a business expenditure allowable u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act
ITAT Jaipur held that reassessment of income under section 147 of the Income Tax Act other than income in respect of which AO has formed a reason to believe that the income has escaped assessment is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Jaipur’s decision on Sakku Devi’s penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act due to non-compliance with notices sent to an incorrect address.
This article discusses case of Gayatri Devi vs. PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) regarding Section 263, highlighting importance of genuine errors in assessments.
Explore significant ITAT Jaipur ruling in case of Kunan Mal Kalu Ram Jain vs. ITO, highlighting rejection of profit estimation without rejecting books of accounts.
ITAT Jaipur held that disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS unjustified merely on the allegation that certificate of accountant furnished is not in accordance with Rule 31ACB as such disallowance will lead to double taxation which is against the spirit of law.
In the case of Suresh Kumar Doodi vs. ACIT, ITAT Jaipur rules that delay in filing Form 67 doesn’t result in disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit under Rule 128(9).
Analyzing the recent ITAT Jaipur ruling on Safiq Ahmad Vs ITO. Assessee penalized for failing to cooperate in penalty proceedings under Sections 271B & 271(1)(c) of the Act.
