Shri Selvaperumal Govindraj Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) We noted that the legal position is very clear that profit rate as mentioned in the provisions of Section 44AD of the Act, cannot be applied to commission agents who are doing business of agency commission or earning commission income only in view of provisions of Section 44AD(6)(iii) […]
Arjun Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The ld. Senior DR stated that the assessee has not elaborated how the assessee’s health condition was not viable for filing of appeal or there is no supporting evidence for the reason that the assessee’s health condition was not proper. Hence, he stated that the delay of […]
ACIT Vs S. Mohan Kumar (ITAT Chennai) Conclusion: Assessee failed to file necessary evidence to establish credits appearing in the names of above two persons in the books of account of the assessee as genuine transactions, therefore, addition of unexplained credits was rightly justified. Held: AO made additions towards credits on the ground that the […]
Jeyaraman Senthil Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT CHENNAI) On perusal of the appellate order, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has given several opportunities and the assessee could not appear before the ld. CIT(A) due to circumstances beyond his control being COVID-19 pandemic period. Hence, we are of the opinion that one more opportunity should be […]
Mohideen Sharif Inayathulla Sharif Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Ground- The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-13, Chennai failed to independently apply his mind that the village in which this land is situated is more than 5 kilometers from the nearest municipal limits. A mere misstatement or confusion with regard to the identical name of 2 villages […]
Tractors and Farm Equipment Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) The submissions of Ld. AR are that warranty expenditure is part of overall sales obligations and the expenditure is reimbursed on actual basis. The warranty obligation being part and parcel of sales transactions and therefore, the same could not be held to be ‘fees for technical […]
Shanmugar Services Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) As per the provisions of Sec.194C of the Act, any person responsible for making payment for any services needs to deduct TDS on such payment at the prescribed rate. From the plain reading of Sec.194C of the Act, it is abundantly clear that the person who makes payment is […]
P. Divagar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) n the present case, the only issue for consideration is whether the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Act is valid or not. For the sake of convenience, the reasons recorded and communicated to the assessee are reproduced as under: “The assessee filed his return of income […]
Learned PCIT has exceeded her jurisdiction in examining issues other than the issues which is subject matter of limited scrutiny assessment proceedings before the Assessing Officer.
. Expenses such as reflooring, painting of walls, false ceiling, temporary wooden structures were incurred to produce the right ambience to attract customers
